4 Comments

Thank you Travis for raising very relevant concerns regarding the IRS guidance proposal. An arbitrary emissions limit is being proposed as a threshold for eliminating a taxpayer-funded subsidy. (BTW, I believe with U.S. economic growth the threshold will become impossible to meet.) A more basic question is what if carbon dioxide emissions are eventually determined to be a net social good? It was only about 50 years ago that the alarmist rhetoric focused on "global cooling." How about going back to focusing on minimizing the release of pollutants with well-documented health harms such as arsenic and lead?

Expand full comment
author

Call me old fashioned, but I think a national CO2 policy should be debated through the process of regular order. Passing a "landmark" climate policy in secret via budget reconciliation makes it more harshly partisan and more likely to be poorly constructed (as the IRA clearly is). Fortunately for taxpayers, budget reconciliation measures are also easier to reverse.

Expand full comment

Thanks, Travis. Green Tyranny has been unleashed by the entire world of WASHINGTON, DC. Checks and balances have a special importance right now.

Expand full comment

Water vapor, clouds, ice, snow create 30% albedo which makes the Earth cooler not warmer.

W/o GHE there is no water and Earth goes lunarific, a barren rock ball, 400 K lit side, 100 K dark refuting a warming GHE.

“TFK_bams09” GHE heat balance graphic and ubiquitous clones don’t balance plus violate LoT.

Kinetic heat transfer processes of contiguous atmospheric molecules render a surface black body and it’s “extra” upwelling GHE energy impossible.

GHE is bogus and CAGW a scam so alarmists must resort to fear mongering lies, lawsuits, censorship and violence.

Expand full comment